Restore the Constitution

About this Project

This is the first Restore the Constitution Project for you to undertake in your county. Using it you can deliver the message that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land. You will find instructions, sources for supplies and a Proof of Service Form for this project. Other projects, each on its own small site, will follow. Using these, you can serve law enforcement officers with a letter and a copy of the Constitution. If you like, you can also include a copy of “The Proper Role of Law Enforcement,” by Sheriff Richard Mack.

The project can be carried out by a small group very inexpensively. It is the first of a series of such projects. Together, the projects will enable you to restore your county to government by the people, transitioning from the present system to one that is stable and reliable and resistant to becoming uppity.

The Heritage Association, who is sponsoring the Restore the Constitution Projects, can be organized in each county to do further outreach to the people who you could never get interested in politics. Ordinary people are interested in learning the history of the Common Law and the Constitution using the speeches and other resources provided when it is introduced as a short presentation that includes history and made relevant. Through existing local organizations such as the Lion's Club and your local women's club, we can inject an understanding of how America was intended to work using the Common Law in the hands of the people and the Constitution to rigidly limit the power of government. You can show them how a common law court worked using the model we will provide. They can see how it feels to be a real jury, the kind familiar to our ancestors, that decided on fact AND law.

First broaden understanding into the mainstream, then we will be in a position to take effective action. This can happen in just a few months when accompanied by the opeds and other materials Heritage makes available. Heritage provides a foundation for local organizing; you can use it or another local organization, as works for you. Please read this and pass it on.

Thanks, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

Restore Constitutional Government to America

Every day we move closer; every time we open the paper, surf the Internet, it is worse. Left, right, libertarian, green, we know in our bones and hearts that we need to take action. We have been divided along lines of political opinion where we should have been joined to find solutions. We have been cut off from each other, manipulated for the profit of corporations and their cronies. It is bad and when we look into the future there is little to spark hope; The meltdown of the economy and the narrowing of what is permitted us grows daily more frightening.

Like someone trying to restart their car as it rolls towards the cliff, we all face the same crying need whether we recognized that years ago or last week. We need to reactivate the Constitution as the law of the land. That awareness might have grow slowly but it has now reached a tipping point.

It was the Constitution, intended to limit government, never us, and the Common Law that were to stand between us and tyranny. They are the foundation of our freedoms, the tools we need desperately today to check the unbridled greed of those who are caging us in to a perpetual serfdom.

When we get in our cars, when we see a law enforcement officer we feel fear, not relief. It is wrong; it violates the intentions of our Founders and the spiritual direction intended for us as the people who would govern themselves.

We are being pitted against those sworn to protect and defend. This threatens us and also those who follow orders intended to use them as weapons against us. This is the pause point, when action is still possible without violence. Those in law enforcement must be recalled to their duty and to an essential understanding of their oath and the Constitution. It can be done.

We can thwart the attempt to use local law enforcement as a tool to oppress us. To do that we need to let them know directly that the Constitution was not canceled, as so many have been told. This morning I had a conversation with a friend in DC who was shocked speechless to discover that a year ago local police were beginning to lump 'Constitutionalists,' and those who talk about their rights along with gangs. I heard this in a local luncheon meeting of the National Federation of Republican Women from a deputy sheriff who waxed eloquent on the subject. Being a Constitutionalist myself I began to worry.

A few days ago another friend of mine was told by a local policeman that he did not have to pay attention to the Constitution. It was just a piece of paper

Most judges do not sign the oath of office mandated by the Constitution. Like Thomas Anderle of Santa Barbara, they act like they are the law.

When someone, or thousands of someones like those employed in law enforcement, are so seriously mistaken then it is time to take rapid action. In this country today those in law enforcement are being aimed at us, manipulated to do ugly things to us and our neighbors. Those training them are telling them this is what it means to be in law enforcement. It is wrong.

When the system is this far out of line you need to make sure they get the message. But that message must be non-violent; most of those in law enforcement are not rocket scientists and they, too, are at risk. Law Enforcement officers who violate their oath can and will end up in jail, lose their pensions, and be bankrupted by civil actions. And if they do not draw back that is what we need to make sure happens.

But it is far better for all of us to send them a word of caution and advise now.

So this is what we propose.

In every county in the US we need to serve everyone working in law enforcement with a demand letter requiring that they read the Constitution and be bound by it. We need to spell out the consequences for ignoring that demand, for their sake as well as our own.

If you have read Richard Mack's book, “The Proper Role of Law Enforcement,” or heard him speak you know about his story and how he was awakened to his obligation to follow the Constitution while he was still a cop writing traffic tickets. One day while writing a ticket he was struck by the fact that the woman had done nothing that endangered anyone or anything. He could not continue writing. Turning away, his mind in a tumult, he went into the station house, found the oath he had signed, and read it carefully. Mack said of that moment, “In the oath I gave my word and promise to protect and defend and obey the U. S. Constitution and the Utah Constitution as well. I had never read either and knew virtually nothing about them.” It changed his life. He began to study the Constitution. When Richard Mack became a sheriff himself he insisted each officer carry the small book with them. Those officers began calling it, “Mack's Bible.”

That moment of insight became the moment that turned back the threat of the Brady Bill, creating the Supreme Court Decision that affirmed the right of the sheriff in the local county to uphold the Constitution. The issue of that moment was the 2^nd Amendment but the larger issue was the obligation of the county sheriff to uphold the Constitution despite orders from Washington D.C.

We need every officer to confront the choices they will be asked to make before harm is done. We can do that now.

We have put together a simple set of instructions and some resources so you can gently remind law enforcement in your community that the Constitution of their duty and the danger they may face if they fail to choose honorably. You can find that site at Constitution Your County.

Although the future looks bleak we actually stand at a point in time that makes change more possible than you might imagine.

Americans are the people who fought to establish for all time the right to govern themselves. They fought and died to pass on to us that wisdom. The wise understand that hope is a place on the horizon towards which they look, that draws them to become greater than they imagined possible. The future looks bleak, but it can be wonderful, if we make it so. This can become the launch point for an America that takes us back to hope and on to a vibrant reality we live and leave our children. Together, we can make it so

Barak Obama is not qualified to be President. The REAL 13th Amendment

You walk in the kitchen and your four year old is standing next to the counter. The top is off the cookie jar and his face is suspiciously lumpy; the little mouth is working wildly, the throat is bobbing up and down. “Arthur, have you been into the cookie jar?” You go through the motions of asking, even if what is going on could not be more obvious.

“No, Mommy,” Arthur says through that last mouthful of cookie, “The top just fell off.” Then he looks at you to see if it is going to work. This is a defining moment. If you let it go the raids on the cookie jar will leave it empty. Good Moms know what to do.

Today Americans are experiencing just such a moment. The facts are out there in plain sight but it is painful to admit just how lacking in simple decency and honor those in positions of trust have been and for how long. There need to be consequences.

It is not such a reach from President, judges, congressmen et al to that four year old. They all saw the opportunity; they tested the limits. The four year old and the rest all use the Big Lie and Denial; the second grouping also use other methods, for instance misdirection into war and other techniques just as ugly. But now we are going to dig into the back story just a little. We are going to see just how obvious this all could have been if generations had not lapsed from the time the top came off the cookie jar until now. Sometimes the answers reside in the questions you did not ask. But given the imminent bankruptcy facing us today it was time you know.

You probably could not tell anyone what the 13^th Amendment says to save your life. You would be surprised to know that, even if you look, the real amendment, the one ratified by the Virginia General Assembly on March 12, 1819, is very different than the one you find today. It's rediscovery was a fluke through the research of archival research expert David Dodge late in 1983. Dodge was looking for evidence of government corruption in the public records sequestered in the Belfast Library in Maine when he and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn came upon a copy of the U. S. Constitution printed in 1825. It included the text of the ratified 13^th Amendment, then the last amendment to that document.

They read, “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

A title of nobility from an Emperor, King, Prince, Foreign Power? By taking away their citizenship our Founders showed they were very serious about the matter.

The title they aimed to eliminate was 'Esquire.' The allegiance they intended to make impossible for any American citizen was membership is the BAR Association. BAR means British Accredited Registry. It is a title of nobility, which explains a lot, given how most of lawyers act. All Bar Associations are directly affiliated with the international Bar Association. That organization is located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. As the District of Columbia is not part of any state and Vatican City is not part of Italy so this part of the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London is set apart, making it a sovereign and independent territory to Great Britain. Great Britain came under the control of the Rothschilds at the close of the Battle of Waterloo in Belgium on Sunday 18 June 1815. During the uncertainty of the battle the Rothschilds raided the funds that held the wealth of Britain, leaving Britain heavily in debt. Then they turned their eyes to America.

If you understand the history of Bar Associations in America the intentions of those who removed nearly all of the original Constitutions becomes clear, just like a clever four year old putting the top back on the cookie jar. No BAR associations were formed or operated in the United States for the period between 1822 and 1867. By then most Americans who understood had died.

The faux 13^th, actually the 14^th Amendment, was passed unlawfully, proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Thirty-eighth Congress, on the 31st day of January, 1865 at the close of the Civil War. Naturally, many states were not represented.

It was not an accident. After that time the infestation of lawyers began to rise and the power of the people began to diminish as statute law was used to displace the use of Common Law, which had remained securely in the hands of the people. The Common Law was one of the essential checks to runaway power that our Founders never imagined would be displaced.

Elections and direct control of the justice system are essential if a free people are to govern themselves. Those who have been raiding the cookie jar for so many generations now need slap down and the 13^th Amendment and a forensic audit of the books of every county in the US are the tools that will provide the whipping.

No one who is a member of the Bar Association can lawfully be in office. Those who are members of the Bar are not eligible to hold office. Those who would nominate Barak Obama, take note and also demand the medical records for John McCain. Each party must nominate someone who is sane and qualified, not vanilla and chocolate fascists. The same is true for nearly all judges, for instance Thomas Anderle of Santa Barbara Superior Court who, along with being a member of the Bar also rewrote his 'oath of office' in a way that now makes far more sense. The 'oath' Anderle signed excised the following:

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence.”

Anderle did not want to be liable for a membership that stripped him of US citizenship and left him accountable for treason. He wanted to continue to profit from a systematic and outrageous interlinkages of corporations from which he profits mightily along with the favored category of 'government employees' who have been bleeding America dry for generations.

Most county employees are oblivious, and rightly so. They do not profit much from the system. Those profits go to a small number of individuals occupying such positions as 'judge,' as in the case of Tom Anderle in Santa Barbara. Most employees are not 'participating' in the pension funds that are collected from tax payers. They receive a pension but that is a tiny mite of money compared to the monumental flood of wealth that flows through those funds into investments in pharmaceuticals, war munitions, banking and petroleum industries through the 'corporations' that place those funds for the benefit of those few. The habits of bankers are very contagious.

You might have wondered why the world seems upside down, how Anderle and others in his position could profit.. This is how it happens. The slight of hand is in the incorporating, the voracious greed that sees no need to concern itself with consequences, and the kind of people who will do anything to occupy positions of trust.

A county or city incorporates to immunize itself from accountability. Incorporating is a shield from liability for those involved in the biggest scam ever visited on a trusting people. Like the 13^th Amendment, the scheme was worked out over time, before our eyes, enabling those we trusted to ignore the Constitution and original court system, displacing the courts intended to remain in the hands of the people with the 'courts' you see today staffed with 'judges' whose allegiance is not to the legitimate government of America but to, surprise, the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia and to their Bar Association, and so by affiliation to the International Bar Association in Britain.

The profits were a real temptation. In California, for instance, those amount to millions, and millions of dollars paid out to each judge. Firemen and police receive a pittance in comparison and all of it is paid for by the people who have returned to the status of serfs, laboring day and night to pay tithes to those who have placed themselves in positions of nobility.

And 'Judge Anderle' eats his long lunch at the University Club, farts happily, while belching and considers a portfolio that continues to grow long from a poverty imposed by stealth, theft, and more ugliness than you can imagine.

Americans have been reduced to a condition of ryot tenure, also called 'soft slavery' that gives the illusion of freedom while tied to the land, forced to pay to live. Today government, through FEMA, is buying up food in anticipation of what is to come. A company in Washington State that sells freeze dried food was forced just a short while ago to sell its entire stock to FEMA, despite the contracts it had signed to supply that food to ordinary Americans. As our food now comes largely from abroad you will soon have to surrender to eat.

The cookie crumbs are all over their faces and it is time to get out the rod and teach them that crime does not pay.

Americans can be free; Start now; take back your county. Free yourself of your illusions, then get busy.

What Law Enforcement Needs to Know

There is no Nuremberg Defense for those who violate the Constitution – Take Note.

Nuremberg delivered a message that is very much on point today for those in government; If you are employed in law enforcement, take heed. Most police and sheriffs today have been lied to, sold a bill of goods. Most believe that they do not have to uphold the Constitution; they believe they are safe from prosecution and accountability if they follow orders. That principle was debunked in Nuremberg and will be again.

Cops hear it from 'up the chain of command,' they hear it when they go into court to testify. But as they violate the rights of those their oath promises to preserve and protect they walk on thin ice. They are listening to lies, putting reliance in falsehoods. Americans are slow to anger but anger is coming. If you swore to uphold the Constitution, take note.

Most judges sitting on the bench today are there unlawfully. An example is Thomas Anderle, who is 'on the bench' in Santa Barbara County. Anderle, an exemplar of all that is wrong with the system; he has ignored his obligation to affirm the oath of office mandated by both the State of California and the US Constitution. Full of arrogance, he rewrote the pledge, eliminating its most important parts and has posted no bond, paid for by himself. This noticed, all decisions he rendered are void. Anderle and other judges understand this. Today, many are frantic to set up trusts that immunize them from what will come so they can keep their ill-gotten gains. Those who set up off shore trusts for individuals report increasing trade from clients in government. Those in law enforcement remain oblivious; they are unaware of the liabilities they face.

Judges knowingly encourage law enforcement officers to commit unconstitutional acts, for instance traffic tickets. Most in law enforcement are less well educated and used to just taking orders. The incomes of judges are heavily dependent on the monies squeezed out of Americans in this and other ways – and selling verdicts is profitable. Compliant cops are essential to those profits. Cops will be left flat-footed, mouths gaping when called to account for their actions. They should not expect support from those who are now giving the orders. Bush will be in Paraguay, which has no extradition; No accident.

But a few courageous individuals have always been willing to stand up for the rights granted, not by government but by God, as set out in the Declaration of Independence. These examples stiffen the spine and show us the way.

Charlie Sprinkle insisted on a jury trial when he refused to take out a driver's license in 1973. The jury later told him they would have found him innocent if the judge had not directed them to find him guilty. That, in case you did not know, also violated the Constitution. The Constitution was written to be used with the Common Law and that system of justice, in use for over a thousand years, relies on the ability of the jury to determine matters of both law and fact. That was affirmed in our Constitution because of the Zenger Case heard in New York in 1735. Zenger broke the law; that law was publishing the truth about the Royal Governor in New York. That case gave you the 1^nd Amendment and the case was alive in the minds of our Founders when they wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The truth needs no excuse and makes no apology. Law and fact are both determined by the jury in the Common Law. Juries are intended to exercise veto power over legislation that violates the Constitution. Both by elections and the law, the power was to remain in the hands of the people.

During Charlie's attempts to resist compliance with the fine the court had demanded the judge leaned forward and said, “I know we are committing treason but there is nothing I can do about it. If I let you comply with the Constitution the US will be broke in three days.” Charlie again refused. “No, Sir,” said Charlie, “The Constitution does not give government the right to force Americans to have licenses. I'm not going to do it.” And he didn't.

Eventually, Charlie went to jail because he refused to pay the $35.00 fine mandated by the court for not complying and having a driver's license. Charlie was and is a Constitutionalist. He knew perfectly well that the Constitution does not give the government the right to force people to have a license to drive.

After refusing to pay the first time Charlie was asked to come back in thirty days after he had considered whether or not he would pay. Returning in one month, Charlie informed the court he did not have $35.00 in legal tender. Legal tender was, Charlie informed the judge, gold or silver coin, as stated in Article 1, section 9 of the U. S. Constitution. To pay in Federal Reserve Notes would be to conspire with the court in treason, a criminal act. When you see what is right, you do it. Charlie did that.

Charlie went to jail because his conscience allowed him no alternative. Today there are more decent men and women serving time in jail than there are in law enforcement or on the bench or in any area of 'public service.'

That is one reason we need more men like Charlie and Sheriff Richard Mack.

Decent and honorable men like Sheriff Mack have tried to warn us and get the word to law enforcement officials. While still a cop handing out traffic tickets Richard Mack saw that what he was doing violated the oath he had taken to uphold the Constitution. Until then he had not read that document. When he saw that he changed how he did his job. He became a peace officer, working to serve and protect.

In 1994 it was Sheriff Mack who filed against the Brady Bill, overturning that unconstitutional law with the Mack-Printz Decision in 1998. There have always been individuals who stood up and did the right thing. Mack is still speaking out today and he will never be silenced.

When Charlie got out of jail in 1973 he filed a law suit against Ronald Reagan, then governor of California, and his wife, Nancy. He called Nancy a welfare queen sucking at the public trough. After the law suit was filed, and after the lawyers failed three times to have the suit dismissed, Charlie received an offer. He was then living in the low rent district of Ventura, California.

A sleek black limo rolled up to Charlie's door. Charlie was watching the neighborhood; he knew the authorities were a touch annoyed with him. Two guys got out of the car dressed in dark suits. They came to the door and asked for Charlie. Charlie today confessed to being a little cautious. The two men told Charlie that if he did not pursue the law suit he would never be molested again. Charlie considered this and told the two men he would think about it.

Charlie let 15 minutes go by. Then he got in to his car and took off for the 101 Fwy heading north towards Santa Barbara going 90 miles an hour. He passed a CHP car and then pulled over, waiting for the CHP to stop, which it did.

The officer asked for Charlie's license. Charlie told the officer he did not want or need a license.. The officer asked for his name. Informed, the officer asked if there was anything he could do to help. Charlie declined and the officer nodded and returned to his car. Today Charlie still does not have a license.

That should be all of us. Together, it can be. Know your rights, stand up for them.

It does not matter if you are an American. All of us are invested with inherent rights before any government existed. Government did not give you your rights; it cannot take them away. Each of us is sovereign over ourselves but over no one else. America is the nation made up of the people who govern themselves. If someone tells you different refer them to Thomas Jefferson.

Those in law enforcement need to understand that the people are the government. We are slow to anger, slow to act. As Thomas Jefferson said so eloquently,

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Freedom is not free, but it is worth the price, We paid that price once and we can do it again.

Restore the Constitution; Indict Thomas Anderle.

We live in a world where the handicapped are tazered sitting in their wheelchairs; where Americans will be forced to wear an electronic bracelet to travel on a plane; where our conversations are recorded though the phones for which we pay, and where the prison system is viewed as a profit center for government. This should give you pause. As you watch, the banks that held the sweat and earnings of lifetimes are melting down into nothing. Our funds are disappearing into the already bulging coffers of foreigners. It is time to take stock, to look baldly at where we are and consider what it means to be an American.

On the 4th of July you probably watched fireworks, a distraction. Instead, listen as someone reads aloud the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration is the mission statement of a people who rejected the idea that government was sovereign, instead fulfilling the vision of a people who governed themselves.

How long has it been since we had an honest election? For how long have you accepted the pablum dished out as patriotism without understanding that being an American means not flags and fireworks but insisting that the power of government remain directly with people?

After years of war those long dead revolutionaries adopted a Constitution intended not to govern them but to strictly limit what government could do in their names. One of the most important safeguards they included was an Oath of Office, to be signed and kept on file for every one of those employed to do the work assigned to government.

Today as many as 90% of those elected to positions of trust ignore that Oath. They have their reasons, and those reasons would incite our Founders to action. They should move us to action as well.

Included with this mailing is a copy of the complaint and demand filed with the District Attorney for Santa Barbara County, Monday July 14th, 2008. The matter to be taken up is the unlawful presence of Thomas Anderle, sitting as a judge of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara. “Judge” Anderle placed on file a truncated Oath of Office, failed to pay for a bond, and otherwise violated the law and the Constitution of the State of California and the U. S. Constitution.

George Bush has said that the Constitution is just a piece of paper. What do you think? How do you feel when you read about another attack on Americans by our own government? If you think the Constitution is just a piece of paper then you are wrong. It is the bulwark intended to protect you from corruption. Today we need to make sure it is fully in force.

On the 4th of July you should have read the Declaration of Independence. Remind yourself what it means to be free and an American. Then read the complaint being filed against Thomas Anderle below. No one can be free unless they free themselves from illusion first.

“”Addendum of Complaint and demand for Grand Jury against Thomas Anderle, sitting unlawfully as a judge of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara.

Cause of Action:

  The Constitution of the State of California requires that an oath be signed
for any elected official to be lawfully in office.  Additionally, the official must
provide a bond, paid for by himself. The wording of the Oath of Office is mandated by
law.  In California that wording, found in the,  “CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 20
MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS is as follows:

"I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States
and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith
and allegiance to the  Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take
this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties upon which I am about
to enter.

     "And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor  am I a member of any party or
organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the  United States
or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately
preceding the taking of  this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political
or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the  United States or of the State of California
by force or violence

   or other unlawful means except as follows:
   ________________________________________________________________

       (If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office
of ______________

   ________________________________ I will not advocate nor become
           (name of office)
 a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise,  that advocates the overthrow of the
Government of the United  States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means."

 
The Oath of Office was taken very seriously by our Founders. For any elected
official, including all judges, to lawfully occupy an elected office, the Oath
must be signed by a notary and the seal present. Even then the Oath is not binding
if not accompanied by a Bond, paid for by the individual himself.  The bond provides
insurance for litigants against corruption or incompetence by the judge. A record of
that bond must be on file and available for public scrutiny. Every litigant should
demand this proof to ensure that the judge is acting lawfully.
 
Each of these specific requirements must be in place and on file. Failure to fulfill
any of the above is a felony. 
 
In the case of Thomas Anderle, presently sitting on the bench of the Superior Court
in Santa Barbara, the Oath of Office fails all of these requirements.  First, it
has been intentionally altered.  The second paragraph is missing, entirely excised.
On this alone Anderle is occupying the office of judge unlawfully.  But there is more.

 
The document has at the top “corrected” and this poses the question of why such a
notation would have been made and, given the many discrepancies with the document,
what the word, “corrected,” was intended to explain.
 
The evidence  is a copy of the Oath on file. (see copy reproduced on the last page).

 
The Oath is itself evidence of a felony.  Anderle is guilty, caught in the act.
 
A copy of this complaint is being sent to the media, both in Santa Barbara and
nationally and to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of California
and to all Federal officials who are required by their own Oaths to take action
in the matter.  Anderle had been elected to positions of trust by the legal
community, bringing into question their honor and judgment as well.  Since the
rectitude and honor of the entire system must now be in question it is essential
that this inquiry be open to the greatest possible scrutiny.
 
That this has been allowed to take place must, necessarily, bring much more into
question.
 
The lack of the Oath of Office, a simple requirement intended to ensure compliance
with the Code of California, the State Constitution and the Constitution of the
United States, has effectively removed accountability for all decisions rendered.
No one whose career has been in law can argue ignorance, the facts and bald, glaring.
The next question is whether or not Anderle altered the oath and failed to post his
bond because he had reason to fear he would be opened up for other charges.  Since
the part of the Oath Anderle removed was included in the second paragraph it is
reasonable to consider the content of that section for indications of what he
intended to evade.  That section reads,

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence.”

Excising the part of the Oath that makes it actionable to be a member of a party or
organization that advocates the overthrow of the government by means political or
otherwise, brings Anderle's motives into critical focus. The Grand Jury should
scrutinize every part of Anderle's life and that of his family and professional
associates and clients.  
 
However, some matters leave no doubt  Thomas Anderle, has never been lawfully on
the bench of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara, this being his second term, many
cases have been decided;  Therefore all decisions rendered in every case must be
deemed vacated.  All litigants who came before him must be notified immediately.
At a minimum all cases need to be relitigated.  The costs and damages for this
fall strictly and entirely on Anderle and on those who were derelict in their
duty, acting under color of law.  Anderle as an individual and those others who
ignored their duty must be held accountable, not the taxpayers.  The proof here
presented is irrefutable.
 
The Grand Jury must be called; an investigation undertaken.  The oaths of all
officials involved  must be examined.  Are their own Oaths in order?
 
Failure to act in this instance is, itself, actionable.
 
The Supreme law of the United States is the Constitution.  In California it
resides in the State Constitution.  Ultimately, the government in all of its
parts resides in the people; when the honor of any part of the institutions
elected by the people are in question, the power to change it is theirs. 

This matter goes beyond one rogue judge to questions for which the people must have

answers; That accounting must be rendered.””

It is time that we, the people, examined every Oath of Office by every judge
and other official.  It is time for the accounting to begin.
 
Benjamin Franklin said this, “Those who give up essential liberty to purchase
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety.”  What you do now
will tell your children and grandchildren if you, yourself, deserved freedom -
and it will determine everything about their future.

The Trial of George Bush for Treason in your County

Today is the 4^th of July. Remember the Revolution, Read the Declaration of Independence. Consider the world that confronted those now dead. Then charge George Bush with Treason and Murder. We were once free and we can be so again. We have the tools, if we will use them.

Restoring the Constitution is a need that is long past the band aids of opeds and education. To keep it from dying Americans must use it to restore the government, taking control into their own hands. That will be a battle in itself, but it can be done. Americans have been hammered, subjected to a disinformation campaign, intended to remove from use the Common Law and the Constitution intended to limit government, not the rights of the people. Remember that. The Constitution was to limit not you but the government. This, government may do only these things and no more; that was the message then, it is the message today.

Restoring the freedoms that the Revolution was fought to protect and affirm means not just acquainting us with that document but putting the law our Founders intended us to use to enact justice for ourselves in our own communities into use. That is the Common Law. CopperCards shows you how to use the Constitution and Common Law together, as intended by our Founders.

Today you can do that. You can use the Common Law to form juries in your county. A jury of twelve people can hear charges and the accused can be summoned to hear those charges and defend himself against the truth presented.

There is a reason they attacked those who understand the Common Law. The truth is dangerous to those use government to steal. “The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook,” Guns are not the first weapon they wanted to take out of your hands. The Constitution and Common Law are what they fear most.

You could charge George W. Bush with Treason. You can charge him with murder. The evidence overwhelmingly supports those charges. Will you come forward to establish a Common Law Court in your county? We can show you how.

If you were forced to pay taxes to support the War in Iraq you have a legitimate cause of action against those who took Americans to war, killing millions. If someone you loved died, you have the means in your hands to take action. The Founders put the power and means in your hands. You can be heard; justice can be done. The perpetrator can be tried, convicted, sentenced, and that sentence carried out.

Today you can begin. Nearly every statute passed by those elected violates the intentions of our Founders. The Constitution was intended, remember, to limit them, not us.

Declare your Independence with a new beginning where you live. Will yours be the first county in America to find George Bush guilty? If your sheriff refuses to obey the law will yours be the first county to remove him from office? Most of those elected to office today sit in those positions of trust illegally. Most have no Oath of Office on file. Many have removed the part of the Oath. Few pay for the bond required. All of these Oath, complete, signed and notarized, bond paid, are required. If they are not present the judge, sheriff, commissioner, magistrate, or other Oath-bound official, is sitting in violation of the Constitution. You can remove them; their pretense is itself a felony.

If enough officials are removed, you can constitute a committee to hold an election and elect people to office who will honor their Oaths and the Constitution. Make sure Black Box and those others who understand are involved. Make sure your precincts elect their precinct committee. Use only a paper ballot. Count at the precinct and tally transparently. Then, you will know it was honest.

The power is in your hands because the Declaration put it there. No people will govern themselves unless they know that theirs is the power. Know it.

The Business of Child Stealing in Florida

Under 5 years, blond, blue-eyed - $6,000.00. a top of the line product

We are going to take you behind the lies into the ugly truth that is destroying families for profit every day, in every community across America. You won't want to believe it but when you see their faces, hear their voices, you will understand why this is happening and what it means to your own life, even if you don't have children.

The same system that views children as commodities to be sold also has plans for you. There is a solution and we will get to that.

The CPS steals children using the system paid for by citizens who believe it is being used to protect those in need. That is a fraud; the system actually pumps money into the personal accounts of all those involved in the system, converting children into cash while destroying them and their families. The number of children who emerge from the system, able to function normally, are near zero. Some are never seen again.

The system used includes three stages. The first phase is to shock and intimidate the parents into consenting to let their children be processed into the system. The second phase is to force parents, terrified for their children, to begin a process of 'case management.' That process is a template that is designed to push the parents into emotional meltdown and bankruptcy. The third phase is to sever the parental rights entirely and sell the children.

In the wake of this trauma families are atomized, destroyed. Parents and grandparents never again see the children who connect them to the future. Children lose their past and the anchoring each of us needs to develop into a healthy human being.

Those who carry the process through the stages are well compensated. Agents, Case workers, judges, physicians, clerks, and others expect and receive compensation for services often not even delivered. Compensation takes place through corporations. State employees who fail to take children out of homes are penalized; many of these leave the system which has been converted from a system originally intended to help families to one that profits those in control.

Across the country, CPS experienced high turn overs in case workers struggling under impossible work loads for many years. Good people, motivated to help struggling families were frustrated and unable to help; those are the kinds of caseworkers who simply quit. Cases of extreme abuse while children were in foster care were common. Nothing about the system gave cause for hope it was working. Then the picture changed. The idea that instead of providing services the system as a whole should move to the model of generating income took hold as the concept of privatization was widely adopted by government. Privatization, introduced during the Reagan Years, was pushed by think tanks that saw government, a corporation itself, as the logical partner for other large corporate interests. Children, roads, military services, each of these and more were recalibrated to provide income to those in control. In this way, the problem with social services created an opening that in the late 1990s allowed the least ethical to profit from the pain of others.

PL 105-89 (HR 867), passed into law November 19, 1997, was intended to ensure that children who could not be reunited with their birth families could be placed in loving homes. But those entrusted to carry out the desperately needed changes found the measure enabled a very different agenda. CPS agents and caseworkers could be trained to look at their industry as a profit center. The system began to view children as product to be harvested and parents as barriers to be demolished.

The system became a template for kidnapping, carried out by barely educated caseworkers who were told that they made the law. This itself had become a tenet of belief held by those in power as the foundations of Constitutional law continued to be eroded by a judiciary who graduated from law school ignorant of America's foundational documents. The shift from Constitutional law to statute and whim of court, low-level government employee, and law enforcement is documented in “The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook,” published by the National Center for State Courts in1999.

The stage was set and the feeding frenzy was about to begin.

The process goes through three stages of slow death; ripped from their families the children are bewildered, afraid, vulnerable to the system. The process hinges on secrecy and an asserted immunity from accountability for all involved. Power, through the official but unacknowledged transfer from the Constitution to government by statute, code and whim, renders all of those outside government vulnerable. Caught in that process parents lose track of all the things that brought happiness and normality to their lives. Years later this will mark them. Most will never recover.

This is the story of three families. Each of their stories is still in motion because the pain never stops.

Stage One

Manatee County, Florida has long made a business of stealing children. Families who settle there do not know that, however. They are attracted to the weather, the beauty of the area. If they knew they would never settle anyplace in Florida, which is arguably has the most corrupt CPS system in the nation. The County is run by a Board of Commissioners who meet at this well polished table.

Children are a commodity for which there is a steady and growing market both in the United States and across the world. Child sex-slaves arrive in Europe and elsewhere from unspecified locations; children taken from homes routinely end up in the porn industry. It has been going on for many years but since it did not impact most of us it was easy to ignore. But as counties across the country have cycled down into bankruptcy the need to pump harder for every buck to be made has become more compelling. Today it is not just the most vulnerable who are targeted but families that would before have been passed over as too well connected. In Manatee County the pumping is in fast forward.

Monday, June 2^nd 2008

The two young sons of the Roberts were dropped off at the home of their babysitter, Christina Holbrook, residence11534 57^th Street Circle East, Parrish, Florida. Both parents work. Michelle and James Roberts are both veterans of the US Navy who met while in service to their country. Both came from families with long and honorable histories of serving in the military.

Their oldest son, had been disciplined by his father the day before for jumping up and down on his baby brother, a potentially life-threatening activity. Spanking was the kind of discipline James himself experienced as a child growing up in Tennessee. The spanking had left a slight bruise.

CPS arrived at the babysitter's home at 9:30am. They proceeded to strip the two boys and photograph them in the nude, questioning them for an hour. This was a bewildering and frightening experience for the boys.

The first James and Michelle heard of this was when Michelle received a phone call at 3:30pm from Alicia Habib. Habib presented herself as an agent for Child Protective Services, demanding that the couple present themselves for an 'interview'. No criminal complaint was presented. But the process of intimidation and fear was launched.

Here, Michelle and James find out, to their shock, that the kids have been stripped and photographed. Left feeling as if the ground had been cut out from under them they endured with shock the moment when the deputy sheriff read James his Miranda rights. He was not charged; no criminal complaint was served. Michelle is interviewed. They are given orders. Michelle is to be present when James saw their children. CPS is moving towards building paperwork to take the children away from their parents.

During the interview they were shown the photos taken of their naked children by the deputy. The children's faces were frozen in tears. He did not show them all the photos, keeping them under the paperwork. Michelle found his behavior intimidating. As the photos were shown he questioned her about their use of discipline.

Soon Michelle and James will realize that the CPS has no power unless they give it to them. CPS depends on the ignorance of ordinary people. The first phase had begun.

The system ground them out fine; dehumanizing them and working with fine-tuned intention to show them, by its actions, that they had no rights and no recourse. At the end of the week a hearing was set; they were now being launched into the second phase of the process that intended to wrest their children from them. But during those endless days they began to come out of the shock and consider their alternatives. They considered the Constitution and the rights they knew they had both sworn to defend as members of the armed forces of America.

Michelle loaded the two boys in their car and drove them hundreds of miles to the town where James had grown up. There, she left them with their great-grandparents. When you are seven months pregnant no long drive is comfortable, but for her children Michelle would risk anything.

In the car she prayed that she would not miscarry the baby held so close to her heart.

The two young parents are both veterans of the War in Iraq. Each had joined the Navy, after looking forward to serving their country from their early teems. She planned this as her career, since 7^th Grade. He, since taking in ROTC in High School.

But they had joined a military that they believed cared for its own and kept its promises; after finding that their small son would be have to be left with someone else while both served in the war zone, they resigned. Their son, Lukas, was born the following October.

Now, they knew what the military is about. To them, they were just bodies to fill slots that civilians could fill at twice the pay. Never previously interested in politics they began to think about how the world was being run.

From the time you join you are told he is your commander and chief. She was not a Bush fan, but you cannot say it without fear of reprisal.

But Florida CPS was not finished with them. Although they did not know it, Habib stood to make nearly $10,000 as her bounty for taking the children, both very adoptable, from their home.

They never could have imagined that the elderly great-grand-parents would be threatened with arrest, but that is what happened. They began studying the Constitution; This, they knew was the real law in America. If they understood it they could use it.

Now they understand that they should never have talked to CPS. If they had not, CPS would have had to leave them alone. CPS uses fear and intimidation to force the appearance that there they have entered into a 'contract' with parents. But since a valid contract cannot exist without the elements of disclosure, consent, and equitable exchange this is a fraud. All parents get is bankruptcy, heartbreak, and too often death.

The Case Plan Ploy – Adam Umholtz

Adam comes from a family that lived in a log cabin in Pennsylvania. The cabin was 230 years old. Made of chestnut beams that are from a species that is not extinct the beams were hand hewed and rectangular and criss crossed. Adam's dad was a pastor for the Southern Home Mission Board. Adam's younger brother was born there, in the horseshoe shaped valley that was filled with berry bushes and food they grew themselves.

Adam went to school at the Advanced Training Institute of America, now the ATI. Now he is an entrepreneur, or was until his life and family was hijacked by the CPS. Adam's children were taken from him and his wife on Monday, July 28^th, 2007. They were given a case plan that it was impossible to fulfill.

As part of the 72 goals laid out in the plan was one requirement that Adam attend a class for sexual offenders who had served time in prison. This was impossible for Adam to do. Adam is attending a study on successful parents and couples, a study in which he and his wife were invited to participate. Both parents are strong Christians who take their faith seriously. Neither parent has ever been to prison for any cause, much less a sexual offense. The charges were falsified made by a neighbor who was later charged with having committed a sexual offense themselves.

Adam cannot attend the classes available because he has never been to prison and has never been a sexual offender. He is not eligible for the class in any case. So the court told Adam to confess to a crime he did not commit to get his kids back. The court has an agenda. If Adam confesses they have a clear track for severing his parental rights. The lack of justice does not bother the court or the attorney who has urged him to confess to a crime he did not commit. They are all paid through the process that steals children for resale.

Parents are routinely told that to 'complete their case plan' they must fulfill requirements that force them to leave jobs that prevent them from attending classes scheduled from 9 – 5 on work days. They are told they cannot be self employed. Every possible block is put in their paths to complete a 'requirement' that is pointless in any case. The same pattern is reported by parents across the United States. Angelina Alexander, a parent in California was told she must quit her job as a taxi driver because she was self employed. Yet she had taken the job, the only one she could find, to fulfill the requirements to attend classes. In her case the report that took her small son from her home was from a former boyfriend who had never seen the child. Complaints that the charge was false were ignored as her processing continued.

Mainstream Americans are at risk today and have no idea what is coming. In Adam's case the CPS had targeted the kids because they were homeschooling and because they had building materials in the back yard. Then a malicious neighbor, made sexual allegations. The neighbor was later proven to have lied.

But the fact that all the 'charges' were illegal did not stop them from forcing you to undertake the 'Case Plan.' There were no charges but they had already taken their eight children out of the home. If the family had known they would have refused to talk to CPS.

Adam and his wife are now approaching bankruptcy although they are better off than many couples because at least they do not have to hide to keep the child still living with them. Most parents face the same problem. Attempts to fulfill the case plan make it impossible to earn a living or are impossible to fulfill. There are no charges. There have been no charges. There will be no charges. As with most couples, they force the father to leave so that they will have a clear shot at grabbing the children from the mother.

CPS has continuously made false allegations, added their youngest child, born after they took the original eight children, to the present case, and over and over ignored the orders of the court. One of their daughters in foster care is suffering from a wound on her foot, acquired in the foster home, for which she is receiving no treatment. The wound continues to fester and they can do nothing.

Although there are no charges Adam and his wife are allowed to see the kids only two hours a week with supervision. And the court continues to threaten to sever their parental rights. Adam does not intend to let that happen.

Adam and his wife are considering their options now that they understand the fraud that has been perpetrated. Those options are growing, along with their understanding of the Constitution and how the system in place has worked to negate their rights.

Phase Three – Severing Parental Rights

Greg Pound and his wife, Malissa, had their parental rights severed in November of 2007. The incident that brought CPS into their lives was a simple accident. A friend's dog visiting their home bit their baby. It could have happened to anyone; the dog's owner was desperately sorry, the dog had never harmed anyone before. Accidents happen. There was a time when an accident was treated with offers of assistance, not viewed as the means for grabbing children from their parents and their home. But that was before those in power noticed the opportunity PL 105-89 (HR 867) offered them.

For four years the Pounds saw their children for just two hours a month. Looking at the children, across the barriers built by CPS always reduced them to tears.

The last time the Pounds saw their children was at the YMCA in Pinellas County. That 'not for profit' is paid 125 million a year, just for that county, according to Pound who says he has researched the subject exhaustively, to 'babysit' kids as they meet their parents in a stark ten by twelve foot room for the two hours they are allowed to be together for those months when they still hoped to be reunited.

The system is intended to separate children, a valuable commodity, from their parents. Mandates to reunite children and parents are consistently ignored as children are processed further and further into the system. What then happens to the children varies, but is in all cases appalling.

Along with the system abuse of families parents attempting to work in the system report that FOIA requests on such routine matters as copies of the Oath of Office and bonds, required by the Constitution, for each judge or elected official or law enforcement officer, are not produced, despite repeated requests. Many ask, over and over again, why such requests should be met with silence and hostility. Parents continue to struggle to regain custody of their children and to exact accountability from those who claim sovereign immunity as government employees from the impact of their acts on ordinary Americans. The claim of sovereign immunity for those employed by government is, according to Constitutional experts such as not employed by government entirely without foundation.

The three families whose cases appear here each report that they will never stop fighting. Each family is presently filing a civil rights suit against those involved in their several cases. In light of yesterday's revelation on child-sex rings, operating across the United States but very present in their own areas of Florida, their questions are ever more anguished as they deal with the echoing emptiness of homes that once held the laughter of children.

Our Constitution - The Open Source for Freedom.

Last week I wrote about the martial law that those in power have been planning for so long. That is the bad news; there are a few more things you should keep in mind as the status quo continues to shred.

Those in power are going to lose. They are the past, the top-down form of human organizing that has always been overthrown by the people with time. We are in the final throes of a revolution that began to reverse the centralization of power with the computer. Now, it is spreading. Those in power know this. Their plans reflect that fear..

Just as we are seeing that open source software will always win we are witnessing a transformation in ourselves. Top-down structure makes those in power dinosaurs, eaten alive by the dispersed, lemurs. Their day is over but they continue to struggle.

The power of open source vs. closed source is a battle that is still shaping the next millennium. Both software engineers and cats understand this. The first has witnessed the change. The second simply refuses to be herded. It only takes a few to innovate. The rest follow.

The world is changing.

The last arenas to feel that change are government and its adjunct, law. They made grandiose and ruthless plans and those are now failing.

We all know about the Red and Blue Lists; we know that Bush and Cheney's plans include instituting martial law and incarcerating approximately eight million Americans whose ideas are hostile to their continued hijacking of America's wealth through the corporate system built up over the last century or more. If you can't control the cats then cage them, they cry.

Most of us have read about the spring night in 2004 when Acting Attorney James Comey, rushed to prevent Chief of Staff Andrew Card and then–White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, sent by George Bush, to bully the hospitalized John Ashcroft from signing papers that would have authorized a surveillance of Americans that they all knew to be entirely unconstitutional. The measure, known by the pompous name of “Continuity of Governance,” was the road map for martial law that would never end. Everyone knows that; in another spring, 2007, the same man, Comey, sat before Congress and told what had taken place that night. An article in Radar Magazine told the story a few days ago but most of us had already heard rumors.

Those in power have been making plans for a long time. They rely on signatures on pieces of paper to immunize them from their crimes. Sometimes those plans worked out; increasingly often they do not.

One of the six nuclear bombs that disappeared last summer left a radio-active crater in Peru, reported by Pravda, September 20, 2007. Naturally, here in the US it was a non-news item.

In most of the world the conflict within the United States over who will dominate is very much under discussion. They cannot change our direction. That, we need to do ourselves.

The problem is greed married to power without conscience. The problem is here.

Today ordinary people struggle to survive the meltdown of our economy, they tremble at the threat of rampant homelessness, a police militarization that has been linked into the use of government to convert all American institutions into reliable if shrinking streams of income which, in cookie cutter fashion, have been replicated everywhere to be changed as needed. One such change is in the offing.

Television and the Internet are merging; that was determined by the logic of technology. Who will be in control is the issue that excites the gluttonous appetites of corporate greed.

According to ipower.ning.com, 2012 will be the Year the Internet Ends . Given the propensities of those in power the wish to extend their business model, all too familiar to Americans today, into the ether regions is not surprising. The computer age is not the sort of thing that megacorporations tolerate. They see the enormous flow of energy and money that began to course through its invisible conduits. They drooled all over the desk of Kevin Martin, the troll of the FCC who has done all possible to give the control of the airways into their hands.

The rise of convergent technologies, technologies will blend all forms of communication into one mighty river; The greedy want control. They believe they are fighting each other, dinosaurs thrashing, clawing, and gouging, for the opportunity to plunder the tiny multitudes. They will fail.

People are open source minded. They move towards freedom whenever and where ever they can. They find or build tools as needed.

Those tools come from all directions. Today a book was republished, and it is a book that anyone who cares about freedom should read. It is a short book, written by a man who said it could be read while sipping a cup of coffee and eating a doughnut. The book talks about things that seem far removed from the open-closed source war, but it encapsulates another debate with the very same underpinnings. That is the militarization of our police and legacy given to us by our Founders and the displacement of that legacy, the Constitution and common law, by statute law and equity courts.

“The Proper Role of Law Enforcement - What Every Citizen Should Know. What Every Cop Should Believe” was originally published by Richard Mack, the Sheriff who first filed against the Brady Bill in 1994. Over the next five years the case worked its way up to the Supreme Court which handed down the opinion in 1998 that the sheriff of a county can make the determination of what is, and what is not, constitutional. The decision cheered gun advocates but it went much further than the 2^nd Amendment in its implications.

The Constitution is an open source document, founded on the common law, which is the open source form for justice.

Statute law, code, and unending agencies constructed on the top-down hierarchal model, are government as we have come to know it. Statute is the artifact of top down thinking, telling us by demonstration that the individual has no power. Government and law perpetuate conflict, converting animosity and control into an industry that squeezes us dry, draining us through all of our relationships, including the most intimate.

It is an ugly picture. Justice should bring peace and with it, happiness. Today the justice system brings fear, bankruptcy, and unending conflict; it is war played out in our communities and lives.

The common law and the Constitution, used as intended by the Founders were reliable, inexpensive, and remained directly in the hands of the people. The Constitution and common law was power in the hands of the people, the open source for freedom, allowing individuals and communities to reduce their conflict and find peace.

Today Americans live in fear of the law. Today the law is war waged against each of us. Ask someone who is stopped for a traffic ticket if they are afraid. Ask a family how they feel when Child Protective Services comes to call.

The war in America is as deep and savage as that being waged in Iraq. It is war made on each of us.

In his book Sheriff Mack said, “ It is time that”…this nation under God, shall have a new birth of freedom… .” It’s time for law enforcement officers to get back to the basics of law enforcement for which their jobs were created---preserving our Constitution. Police have a difficult and thankless job. They put their lives on the line every day in a world affected by drugs and violence and social decay. May each of us in this most noble profession, as we pursue the guilty among us, never be guilty ourselves of the greater crime, that of violating our oath in God’s name to defend the constitutional rights of the people for whom we work.”

When you read the Mack book you cry. Hand it to the cop who wants to make his quota. Hand it to the judge who would hear your case. Give it to your neighbor who thinks there is a difference between McCain, Obama, and Clinton.

Those in power fear the Constitution. They jeer at the common law, but they are afraid. That is why the term, “Home-grown Terrorist,” was crafted. Threats and the posturing of authority are growing thin, and they know it.

The Constitution, laid on the foundation of common law, was intended to be the whole of the law. Read “The Role of Law Enforcement” and you will understand why they are afraid. They know we can still remember freedom.

( Buy The Book. You will be glad you did.)