Saturday, July 26, 2008

Barak Obama is not qualified to be President. The REAL 13th Amendment


You walk in the kitchen and your four year old is standing next to the counter. The top is off the cookie jar and his face is suspiciously lumpy; the little mouth is working wildly, the throat is bobbing up and down. “Arthur, have you been into the cookie jar?” You go through the motions of asking, even if what is going on could not be more obvious.

“No, Mommy,” Arthur says through that last mouthful of cookie, “The top just fell off.” Then he looks at you to see if it is going to work. This is a defining moment. If you let it go the raids on the cookie jar will leave it empty. Good Moms know what to do.

Today Americans are experiencing just such a moment. The facts are out there in plain sight but it is painful to admit just how lacking in simple decency and honor those in positions of trust have been and for how long. There need to be consequences.

It is not such a reach from President, judges, congressmen et al to that four year old. They all saw the opportunity; they tested the limits. The four year old and the rest all use the Big Lie and Denial; the second grouping also use other methods, for instance misdirection into war and other techniques just as ugly. But now we are going to dig into the back story just a little. We are going to see just how obvious this all could have been if generations had not lapsed from the time the top came off the cookie jar until now. Sometimes the answers reside in the questions you did not ask. But given the imminent bankruptcy facing us today it was time you know.

You probably could not tell anyone what the 13th Amendment says to save your life. You would be surprised to know that, even if you look, the real amendment, the one ratified by the Virginia General Assembly on March 12, 1819, is very different than the one you find today. It's rediscovery was a fluke through the research of archival research expert David Dodge late in 1983. Dodge was looking for evidence of government corruption in the public records sequestered in the Belfast Library in Maine when he and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn came upon a copy of the U. S. Constitution printed in 1825. It included the text of the ratified 13th Amendment, then the last amendment to that document.

They read, “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

A title of nobility from an Emperor, King, Prince, Foreign Power? By taking away their citizenship our Founders showed they were very serious about the matter.

The title they aimed to eliminate was 'Esquire.' The allegiance they intended to make impossible for any American citizen was membership is the BAR Association. BAR means British Accredited Registry. It is a title of nobility, which explains a lot, given how most of lawyers act. All Bar Associations are directly affiliated with the international Bar Association. That organization is located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. As the District of Columbia is not part of any state and Vatican City is not part of Italy so this part of the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London is set apart, making it a sovereign and independent territory to Great Britain. Great Britain came under the control of the Rothschilds at the close of the Battle of Waterloo in Belgium on Sunday 18 June 1815. During the uncertainty of the battle the Rothschilds raided the funds that held the wealth of Britain, leaving Britain heavily in debt. Then they turned their eyes to America.

If you understand the history of Bar Associations in America the intentions of those who removed nearly all of the original Constitutions becomes clear, just like a clever four year old putting the top back on the cookie jar. No BAR associations were formed or operated in the United States for the period between 1822 and 1867. By then most Americans who understood had died.

The faux 13th, actually the 14th Amendment, was passed unlawfully, proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Thirty-eighth Congress, on the 31st day of January, 1865 at the close of the Civil War. Naturally, many states were not represented.

It was not an accident. After that time the infestation of lawyers began to rise and the power of the people began to diminish as statute law was used to displace the use of Common Law, which had remained securely in the hands of the people. The Common Law was one of the essential checks to runaway power that our Founders never imagined would be displaced.

Elections and direct control of the justice system are essential if a free people are to govern themselves. Those who have been raiding the cookie jar for so many generations now need slap down and the 13th Amendment and a forensic audit of the books of every county in the US are the tools that will provide the whipping.

No one who is a member of the Bar Association can lawfully be in office. Those who are members of the Bar are not eligible to hold office. Those who would nominate Barak Obama, take note and also demand the medical records for John McCain. Each party must nominate someone who is sane and qualified, not vanilla and chocolate fascists. The same is true for nearly all judges, for instance Thomas Anderle of Santa Barbara Superior Court who, along with being a member of the Bar also rewrote his 'oath of office' in a way that now makes far more sense. The 'oath' Anderle signed excised the following:

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence.”


Anderle did not want to be liable for a membership that stripped him of US citizenship and left him accountable for treason. He wanted to continue to profit from a systematic and outrageous interlinkages of corporations from which he profits mightily along with the favored category of 'government employees' who have been bleeding America dry for generations.

Most county employees are oblivious, and rightly so. They do not profit much from the system. Those profits go to a small number of individuals occupying such positions as 'judge,' as in the case of Tom Anderle in Santa Barbara. Most employees are not 'participating' in the pension funds that are collected from tax payers. They receive a pension but that is a tiny mite of money compared to the monumental flood of wealth that flows through those funds into investments in pharmaceuticals, war munitions, banking and petroleum industries through the 'corporations' that place those funds for the benefit of those few. The habits of bankers are very contagious.

You might have wondered why the world seems upside down, how Anderle and others in his position could profit.. This is how it happens. The slight of hand is in the incorporating, the voracious greed that sees no need to concern itself with consequences, and the kind of people who will do anything to occupy positions of trust.

A county or city incorporates to immunize itself from accountability. Incorporating is a shield from liability for those involved in the biggest scam ever visited on a trusting people. Like the 13th Amendment, the scheme was worked out over time, before our eyes, enabling those we trusted to ignore the Constitution and original court system, displacing the courts intended to remain in the hands of the people with the 'courts' you see today staffed with 'judges' whose allegiance is not to the legitimate government of America but to, surprise, the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia and to their Bar Association, and so by affiliation to the International Bar Association in Britain.

The profits were a real temptation. In California, for instance, those amount to millions, and millions of dollars paid out to each judge. Firemen and police receive a pittance in comparison and all of it is paid for by the people who have returned to the status of serfs, laboring day and night to pay tithes to those who have placed themselves in positions of nobility.


And 'Judge Anderle' eats his long lunch at the University Club, farts happily, while belching and considers a portfolio that continues to grow long from a poverty imposed by stealth, theft, and more ugliness than you can imagine.


Americans have been reduced to a condition of ryot tenure, also called 'soft slavery' that gives the illusion of freedom while tied to the land, forced to pay to live. Today government, through FEMA, is buying up food in anticipation of what is to come. A company in Washington State that sells freeze dried food was forced just a short while ago to sell its entire stock to FEMA, despite the contracts it had signed to supply that food to ordinary Americans. As our food now comes largely from abroad you will soon have to surrender to eat.


The cookie crumbs are all over their faces and it is time to get out the rod and teach them that crime does not pay.


Americans can be free; Start now; take back your county. Free yourself of your illusions, then get busy.



Friday, July 18, 2008

What Law Enforcement Needs to Know


There is no Nuremberg Defense for those who violate the Constitution – Take Note.



Nuremberg delivered a message that is very much on point today for those in government; If you are employed in law enforcement, take heed. Most police and sheriffs today have been lied to, sold a bill of goods. Most believe that they do not have to uphold the Constitution; they believe they are safe from prosecution and accountability if they follow orders. That principle was debunked in Nuremberg and will be again.


Cops hear it from 'up the chain of command,' they hear it when they go into court to testify. But as they violate the rights of those their oath promises to preserve and protect they walk on thin ice. They are listening to lies, putting reliance in falsehoods. Americans are slow to anger but anger is coming. If you swore to uphold the Constitution, take note.


Most judges sitting on the bench today are there unlawfully. An example is Thomas Anderle, who is 'on the bench' in Santa Barbara County. Anderle, an exemplar of all that is wrong with the system; he has ignored his obligation to affirm the oath of office mandated by both the State of California and the US Constitution. Full of arrogance, he rewrote the pledge, eliminating its most important parts and has posted no bond, paid for by himself. This noticed, all decisions he rendered are void. Anderle and other judges understand this. Today, many are frantic to set up trusts that immunize them from what will come so they can keep their ill-gotten gains. Those who set up off shore trusts for individuals report increasing trade from clients in government. Those in law enforcement remain oblivious; they are unaware of the liabilities they face.


Judges knowingly encourage law enforcement officers to commit unconstitutional acts, for instance traffic tickets. Most in law enforcement are less well educated and used to just taking orders. The incomes of judges are heavily dependent on the monies squeezed out of Americans in this and other ways – and selling verdicts is profitable. Compliant cops are essential to those profits. Cops will be left flat-footed, mouths gaping when called to account for their actions. They should not expect support from those who are now giving the orders. Bush will be in Paraguay, which has no extradition; No accident.


But a few courageous individuals have always been willing to stand up for the rights granted, not by government but by God, as set out in the Declaration of Independence. These examples stiffen the spine and show us the way.


Charlie Sprinkle insisted on a jury trial when he refused to take out a driver's license in 1973. The jury later told him they would have found him innocent if the judge had not directed them to find him guilty. That, in case you did not know, also violated the Constitution. The Constitution was written to be used with the Common Law and that system of justice, in use for over a thousand years, relies on the ability of the jury to determine matters of both law and fact. That was affirmed in our Constitution because of the Zenger Case heard in New York in 1735. Zenger broke the law; that law was publishing the truth about the Royal Governor in New York. That case gave you the 1nd Amendment and the case was alive in the minds of our Founders when they wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The truth needs no excuse and makes no apology. Law and fact are both determined by the jury in the Common Law. Juries are intended to exercise veto power over legislation that violates the Constitution. Both by elections and the law, the power was to remain in the hands of the people.


During Charlie's attempts to resist compliance with the fine the court had demanded the judge leaned forward and said, “I know we are committing treason but there is nothing I can do about it. If I let you comply with the Constitution the US will be broke in three days.” Charlie again refused. “No, Sir,” said Charlie, “The Constitution does not give government the right to force Americans to have licenses. I'm not going to do it.” And he didn't.


Eventually, Charlie went to jail because he refused to pay the $35.00 fine mandated by the court for not complying and having a driver's license. Charlie was and is a Constitutionalist. He knew perfectly well that the Constitution does not give the government the right to force people to have a license to drive.


After refusing to pay the first time Charlie was asked to come back in thirty days after he had considered whether or not he would pay. Returning in one month, Charlie informed the court he did not have $35.00 in legal tender. Legal tender was, Charlie informed the judge, gold or silver coin, as stated in Article 1, section 9 of the U. S. Constitution. To pay in Federal Reserve Notes would be to conspire with the court in treason, a criminal act. When you see what is right, you do it. Charlie did that.


Charlie went to jail because his conscience allowed him no alternative. Today there are more decent men and women serving time in jail than there are in law enforcement or on the bench or in any area of 'public service.'


That is one reason we need more men like Charlie and Sheriff Richard Mack.


Decent and honorable men like Sheriff Mack have tried to warn us and get the word to law enforcement officials. While still a cop handing out traffic tickets Richard Mack saw that what he was doing violated the oath he had taken to uphold the Constitution. Until then he had not read that document. When he saw that he changed how he did his job. He became a peace officer, working to serve and protect.


In 1994 it was Sheriff Mack who filed against the Brady Bill, overturning that unconstitutional law with the Mack-Printz Decision in 1998. There have always been individuals who stood up and did the right thing. Mack is still speaking out today and he will never be silenced.


When Charlie got out of jail in 1973 he filed a law suit against Ronald Reagan, then governor of California, and his wife, Nancy. He called Nancy a welfare queen sucking at the public trough. After the law suit was filed, and after the lawyers failed three times to have the suit dismissed, Charlie received an offer. He was then living in the low rent district of Ventura, California.


A sleek black limo rolled up to Charlie's door. Charlie was watching the neighborhood; he knew the authorities were a touch annoyed with him. Two guys got out of the car dressed in dark suits. They came to the door and asked for Charlie. Charlie today confessed to being a little cautious. The two men told Charlie that if he did not pursue the law suit he would never be molested again. Charlie considered this and told the two men he would think about it.

Charlie let 15 minutes go by. Then he got in to his car and took off for the 101 Fwy heading north towards Santa Barbara going 90 miles an hour. He passed a CHP car and then pulled over, waiting for the CHP to stop, which it did.

The officer asked for Charlie's license. Charlie told the officer he did not want or need a license.. The officer asked for his name. Informed, the officer asked if there was anything he could do to help. Charlie declined and the officer nodded and returned to his car. Today Charlie still does not have a license.


That should be all of us. Together, it can be. Know your rights, stand up for them.


It does not matter if you are an American. All of us are invested with inherent rights before any government existed. Government did not give you your rights; it cannot take them away. Each of us is sovereign over ourselves but over no one else. America is the nation made up of the people who govern themselves. If someone tells you different refer them to Thomas Jefferson.


Those in law enforcement need to understand that the people are the government. We are slow to anger, slow to act. As Thomas Jefferson said so eloquently,


Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”


Freedom is not free, but it is worth the price, We paid that price once and we can do it again.



Restore the Constitution; Indict Thomas Anderle.



We live in a world where the handicapped are tazered sitting in their wheelchairs; where Americans will be forced to wear an electronic bracelet to travel on a plane; where our conversations are recorded though the phones for which we pay, and where the prison system is viewed as a profit center for government. This should give you pause. As you watch, the banks that held the sweat and earnings of lifetimes are melting down into nothing. Our funds are disappearing into the already bulging coffers of foreigners. It is time to take stock, to look baldly at where we are and consider what it means to be an American.


On the 4th of July you probably watched fireworks, a distraction. Instead, listen as someone reads aloud the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration is the mission statement of a people who rejected the idea that government was sovereign, instead fulfilling the vision of a people who governed themselves.


How long has it been since we had an honest election? For how long have you accepted the pablum dished out as patriotism without understanding that being an American means not flags and fireworks but insisting that the power of government remain directly with people?


After years of war those long dead revolutionaries adopted a Constitution intended not to govern them but to strictly limit what government could do in their names. One of the most important safeguards they included was an Oath of Office, to be signed and kept on file for every one of those employed to do the work assigned to government.


Today as many as 90% of those elected to positions of trust ignore that Oath. They have their reasons, and those reasons would incite our Founders to action. They should move us to action as well.


Included with this mailing is a copy of the complaint and demand filed with the District Attorney for Santa Barbara County, Monday July 14th, 2008. The matter to be taken up is the unlawful presence of Thomas Anderle, sitting as a judge of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara. “Judge” Anderle placed on file a truncated Oath of Office, failed to pay for a bond, and otherwise violated the law and the Constitution of the State of California and the U. S. Constitution.


George Bush has said that the Constitution is just a piece of paper. What do you think? How do you feel when you read about another attack on Americans by our own government? If you think the Constitution is just a piece of paper then you are wrong. It is the bulwark intended to protect you from corruption. Today we need to make sure it is fully in force.


On the 4th of July you should have read the Declaration of Independence. Remind yourself what it means to be free and an American. Then read the complaint being filed against Thomas Anderle below. No one can be free unless they free themselves from illusion first.


“”Addendum of Complaint and demand for Grand Jury against Thomas Anderle, sitting unlawfully as a judge of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara.


Cause of Action:


  The Constitution of the State of California requires that an oath be signed
for any elected official to be lawfully in office. Additionally, the official must
provide a bond, paid for by himself. The wording of the Oath of Office is mandated by
law. In California that wording, found in the, “CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 20
MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS is as follows:


"I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States
and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith
and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take
this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties upon which I am about

to enter.

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or
organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States
or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately
preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political
or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California
by force or violence


or other unlawful means except as follows:
________________________________________________________________

(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office
of ______________


________________________________ I will not advocate nor become
(name of office)
a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the
Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means."


 
The Oath of Office was taken very seriously by our Founders. For any elected
official, including all judges, to lawfully occupy an elected office, the Oath
must be signed by a notary and the seal present. Even then the Oath is not binding
if not accompanied by a Bond, paid for by the individual himself. The bond provides
insurance for litigants against corruption or incompetence by the judge. A record of
that bond must be on file and available for public scrutiny. Every litigant should
demand this proof to ensure that the judge is acting lawfully.

Each of these specific requirements must be in place and on file. Failure to fulfill
any of the above is a felony.

In the case of Thomas Anderle, presently sitting on the bench of the Superior Court
in Santa Barbara, the Oath of Office fails all of these requirements. First, it
has been intentionally altered. The second paragraph is missing, entirely excised.
On this alone Anderle is occupying the office of judge unlawfully. But there is more.


The document has at the top “corrected” and this poses the question of why such a
notation would have been made and, given the many discrepancies with the document,
what the word, “corrected,” was intended to explain.

The evidence is a copy of the Oath on file. (see copy reproduced on the last page).


The Oath is itself evidence of a felony. Anderle is guilty, caught in the act.

A copy of this complaint is being sent to the media, both in Santa Barbara and
nationally and to the Office of the Attorney General for the State of California
and to all Federal officials who are required by their own Oaths to take action
in the matter. Anderle had been elected to positions of trust by the legal
community, bringing into question their honor and judgment as well. Since the
rectitude and honor of the entire system must now be in question it is essential
that this inquiry be open to the greatest possible scrutiny.

That this has been allowed to take place must, necessarily, bring much more into
question.

The lack of the Oath of Office, a simple requirement intended to ensure compliance
with the Code of California, the State Constitution and the Constitution of the
United States, has effectively removed accountability for all decisions rendered.
No one whose career has been in law can argue ignorance, the facts and bald, glaring.
The next question is whether or not Anderle altered the oath and failed to post his
bond because he had reason to fear he would be opened up for other charges. Since
the part of the Oath Anderle removed was included in the second paragraph it is
reasonable to consider the content of that section for indications of what he
intended to evade. That section reads,

"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence.”


Excising the part of the Oath that makes it actionable to be a member of a party or
organization that advocates the overthrow of the government by means political or
otherwise, brings Anderle's motives into critical focus. The Grand Jury should
scrutinize every part of Anderle's life and that of his family and professional
associates and clients.

However, some matters leave no doubt Thomas Anderle, has never been lawfully on
the bench of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara, this being his second term, many
cases have been decided; Therefore all decisions rendered in every case must be
deemed vacated. All litigants who came before him must be notified immediately.
At a minimum all cases need to be relitigated. The costs and damages for this
fall strictly and entirely on Anderle and on those who were derelict in their
duty, acting under color of law. Anderle as an individual and those others who
ignored their duty must be held accountable, not the taxpayers. The proof here
presented is irrefutable.

The Grand Jury must be called; an investigation undertaken. The oaths of all
officials involved must be examined. Are their own Oaths in order?

Failure to act in this instance is, itself, actionable.

The Supreme law of the United States is the Constitution. In California it
resides in the State Constitution. Ultimately, the government in all of its
parts resides in the people; when the honor of any part of the institutions
elected by the people are in question, the power to change it is theirs.

This matter goes beyond one rogue judge to questions for which the people must have

answers; That accounting must be rendered.””

It is time that we, the people, examined every Oath of Office by every judge
and other official. It is time for the accounting to begin.

Benjamin Franklin said this, “Those who give up essential liberty to purchase
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety.” What you do now
will tell your children and grandchildren if you, yourself, deserved freedom -
and it will determine everything about their future.

Friday, July 04, 2008

The Trial of George Bush for Treason in your County


Today is the 4th of July. Remember the Revolution, Read the Declaration of Independence. Consider the world that confronted those now dead. Then charge George Bush with Treason and Murder. We were once free and we can be so again. We have the tools, if we will use them.


Restoring the Constitution is a need that is long past the band aids of opeds and education. To keep it from dying Americans must use it to restore the government, taking control into their own hands. That will be a battle in itself, but it can be done. Americans have been hammered, subjected to a disinformation campaign, intended to remove from use the Common Law and the Constitution intended to limit government, not the rights of the people. Remember that. The Constitution was to limit not you but the government. This, government may do only these things and no more; that was the message then, it is the message today.


Restoring the freedoms that the Revolution was fought to protect and affirm means not just acquainting us with that document but putting the law our Founders intended us to use to enact justice for ourselves in our own communities into use. That is the Common Law. CopperCards shows you how to use the Constitution and Common Law together, as intended by our Founders.


Today you can do that. You can use the Common Law to form juries in your county. A jury of twelve people can hear charges and the accused can be summoned to hear those charges and defend himself against the truth presented.


There is a reason they attacked those who understand the Common Law. The truth is dangerous to those use government to steal. The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook,” Guns are not the first weapon they wanted to take out of your hands. The Constitution and Common Law are what they fear most.


You could charge George W. Bush with Treason. You can charge him with murder. The evidence overwhelmingly supports those charges. Will you come forward to establish a Common Law Court in your county? We can show you how.


If you were forced to pay taxes to support the War in Iraq you have a legitimate cause of action against those who took Americans to war, killing millions. If someone you loved died, you have the means in your hands to take action. The Founders put the power and means in your hands. You can be heard; justice can be done. The perpetrator can be tried, convicted, sentenced, and that sentence carried out.


Today you can begin. Nearly every statute passed by those elected violates the intentions of our Founders. The Constitution was intended, remember, to limit them, not us.


Declare your Independence with a new beginning where you live. Will yours be the first county in America to find George Bush guilty? If your sheriff refuses to obey the law will yours be the first county to remove him from office? Most of those elected to office today sit in those positions of trust illegally. Most have no Oath of Office on file. Many have removed the part of the Oath. Few pay for the bond required. All of these Oath, complete, signed and notarized, bond paid, are required. If they are not present the judge, sheriff, commissioner, magistrate, or other Oath-bound official, is sitting in violation of the Constitution. You can remove them; their pretense is itself a felony.


If enough officials are removed, you can constitute a committee to hold an election and elect people to office who will honor their Oaths and the Constitution. Make sure Black Box and those others who understand are involved. Make sure your precincts elect their precinct committee. Use only a paper ballot. Count at the precinct and tally transparently. Then, you will know it was honest.


The power is in your hands because the Declaration put it there. No people will govern themselves unless they know that theirs is the power. Know it.